![]() ![]() That said, I’m not trying to compare all features, just the ones that fall under editing. However, Lr still lacks the tethering feature found in LrC, which may be a showstopper for some. Adobe rectified that gap in a recent update that completely revamped the local adjustment/selection tools across all Lightroom apps under the new heading of Masking. For the longest time, the lack of a Range Mask type feature in Lr was a real limitation for many people. For some photographers, a single feature or the implementation of a single feature may be the deciding factor for which program works best for their needs. I also stated that “the editing capabilities have nearly reached feature parity” and it is this point that I want to delve deeper into in this issue. ![]() If you are completely off the grid, then neither of these programs will work for you. That said, with all the subscription plans from Adobe you do need enough Internet access to download the programs for local installation, perform periodic checks on the status of your subscription (i.e., that is is paid and in good standing), and installing updates as they become available. For anyone with limited Internet access or capped data plans this aspect of how each program is designed would clearly favor Lightroom Classic. LrC on the other hand can be used in its normal functions of editing, library management, and output while being completely offline. ![]() … have we achieved feature parity? Previously, I wrote about how to decide which version is best for your needs, and I left out an important point that’s worth mentioning now, which is that while it is possible to use Lr offline when needed it really does require a reliable Internet connection and ample data to use it as it is designed. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |